Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Dreams and Ideas
When I was small, I remember having a dream journal, where I would write down what I dreamed of the night before so as not to forget. As I've gotten older, that earlier training allows me to remember at least the more notable ones. I no longer keep a journal, nor do I remember everything, but once in a while something just sticks with me.
Last night I dreamed I was a guest on a talk show, wearing my hot sauce pajamas. And I was trying to sew on the top of my head with an ivory needle, but couldn't find any thread. So I kept asking for thread between interview questions, while holding the top of my head in place.
I have no idea what it means, but I'm sure I can use some of that somewhere.
Thursday, December 24, 2009
There's only one thing more annoying than psuedo science
I have just finished watching the only two seasons of Dead Like Me, which, being an absolutely brilliant, innovative and well-written show, was cancelled within a year. It's rare that a television show makes me even smile inwardly, let alone laugh out loud; even rarer where I feel for the characters at all. There's a genuine tear jerker episode near the end of season two.
After exhausting the entertainment of first round viewing of both this and The Dresden Files (not quite so brilliant, but then again, only a single season) I went on a brief search to find my next set of background noise.
(I tend to listen to t.v. shows while drawing on the computer or photo editing, listen to music while writing.)
Enter 'Fringe'. J.J. Abrams has gotten so much positive press that it's even reached the rock under which I live, no mean feat. Plus, the 'cover copy' as it were, implies that the show is more or less 'X-Files: Take 2', which I also enjoyed(at least the earlier seasons).
Not even close. Beyond some of the leaps of logic taken by the 'brilliant' scientist, beyond even some of the head-bleeding psuedo-science that (beyond making no sense) are shot off in such a way as to induce pure what the fuckery, beyond even alternately making the characters rogue geniuses in one scene and making them Too Stupid To Live in the next for sake of forwarding the plot...
SLOPPY SLOPPY WRITING.
I've watched one episode, and the beginning of another, and the stumbling is enough to pull me right out of the narrative and rant at my computer like a querulous old man.
To wit - a 14 year old boy is going on an (understandable) crime spree with the help of drug induced mind control powers. Fair enough. When the TSTL characters get into his computer, they find he's been searching 20 year old car wrecks, to see if his mother actually died in them, as he was told.
What-wait a second. 20 year old car wrecks? This woman somehow birthed a child SIX YEARS AFTER HER DEATH? Let's hear it for zombie ovum.
Next issue in the 'drove me bonkers' category - to stop the kid's mind powers, the genius scientist finds a toy from the MC's childhood, which emits a recording of a mother's heartbeat from the womb. This sound is suspected to nullify the kid's power - that part is fair enough. What drives me completely mad, is that over and over, the recording is referred to as 'white noise'.
That is NOT white noise. Not even a little. White noise is a signal with a flat power output within the auditory bandwidth, i.e. un-eq'd static. The very act of hearing the heart beat negates the sound EVER being white noise. If the character were half as clever as he were supposed to be, he'd know that.
There were plenty of other 'gimme a break' moments within the episode, but both of those could have easily been avoided by having a clue, or doing one second of research/proof reading.
Another throwaway bit - the business head of a huge tech firm is writing an email or letter at the end of the show to someone...on an APPLE II. Little green screen and everything. If the show were created in 1985, I could let it slide. I honestly couldn't tell you what she was writing or to whom if quizzed; I was far too busy ranting about the six inch monochrome screen.
Within two minutes of watching the next episode, I wanted to hit someone in the head, preferably whomever chose this prop...
So there's this alien observer dude, watching people in the park with folding opera glasses. They also sell these at sporting events; you can buy them online in a plastic version new, or with a bit of looking around, in a metal case used. They run between five and fifteen dollars in most cases.
A veteran comes up to alien dude, saying 'I've never seen something like those before.'
Alien dude replies. 'that's because they're from somewhere else.'
REALLY?? C'MON. Talk about insulting your audience. I find it hard to believe a vet with a white beard has never been to any sort of show or sporting event, watched enough movies, or seen enough things in passing to recognize something like that.
'From somewhere else'???? You mean the stadium down the street? Or maybe the concessions stand at the Met? I'm not sure who to blame for this one, but someone thinks the viewing public is mentally impaired.
Furthermore (and this might have made me the craziest) it's pretty easy to tell what someone is viewing by looking at the direction of their head. This guy is not bird watching. You're telling me that a veteran soldier isn't in any way suspicious of what some bizarre looking dude is watching?
As a whole, the performances themselves in this show are stellar, the editing is slick, and what caught my attention in the first episode I watched were the elegant supertitles - cool at first, but I see the gimmick wearing thin quickly.
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Research - House M.D
http://www.politedissent.com/house_pd.html
Interestingly enough, they tend to get the weird stuff right, and flub the basics.
Useful terms defined: #1 Checkov's Gun
— Playwright Anton Chekhov (From S. Shchukin, Memoirs. 1911.)
Often confused with foreshadowing (which can be about practically anything) Checkov's Gun refers to specific items to which you call attention while writing. You can leave them alone for a bit, but be darn sure you use that element while it is at least a dim memory in the reader's mind.
In fantasy, this is the amulet that grants a power, the hithero useless sidekick that does something brilliant, etc.
Monday, December 21, 2009
Read this blog/comic!
http://boscafelife.wordpress.com/
Friday, December 18, 2009
Putting the work away for a while
The dialog was far stronger than I remembered (go me!) and flowed believably and beautifully - what a thrill!
On the other hand, the descriptive and action passages clunked harder than an engine with no oil - right before it throws a rod, leaving you stranded on the side of the interstate at three a.m.
When I originally wrote this piece, I was under the mistaken impression that both aspects were decent, if not glowing. Surprise...
It's always a good idea to put that piece away for a little while after you write it. The good bits are never quite as good, and the bad never quite so horrid, as they first appear.
Friday, December 11, 2009
Ophelia the Coffee Cup
I have one coffee cup that I've never lost, for some reason. It was a freebie, from Willoughby's Coffee and Tea in New Haven, CT. It's been all over the country with me, and remained relatively unscathed until this past autumn.
While resting on a plinth near the production truck, it took it upon itself to take a suicidal dive into a nearby stream. I was not there to witness the events. One of my coworkers heroically fished the erstwhile travel mug from it's otherwise certain watery demise (my hero!). A bit of the lid broke off, and it bathed in mud and gravel, but was otherwise unscathed. And a bit of a scar adds character, no?
Another co-worker informed me of the adventure by telling me that the cup had changed it's name to Ophelia.
I used my mug as a puppet to quote Shakespeare for the rest of the week.
Things like that are why I love my job.
Friday, December 4, 2009
Baobob trees!
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Backstage at the Arm of the Sea
Sunday, November 29, 2009
Harlequin puts on the Evil Clown Mask
I just popped into (onto?) some of my favorite writing forums and message boards, only to be confronted with the Harlequin Horizons thing.
What is this thing?
Romance giant Harlequin is putting out a new line, called Horizons. That itself odd (publishers run new lines all the time), but the details?
Harlequin has partnered with Author Solutions (that's vanity press AuthorHouse, guys) and this ENTIRE line is going to be pay to play.
Hoo Boy!
For only $1500, give or take, any writer can now say they've been published by Harlequin, regardless of whether that manuscript is publishable, or even functionally literate. (That's the beauty/horror of vanity presses, innit?)
Of course, these books will not be on the shelf at your local bookstore - like any other vanity printed manuscript, all sales are left up to the writer.
Which is a HUGE stain on Harlequin's reputation. Do they want to remain a legitimate publisher, or become yet another vanity press?
Update: Apparently the backlash was violent enough that HH changed it's name to DellArt press. Smart move guys - I bet the RWA would have had fits about a thousand vanity press writers claiming Harlequin publication!
For more conversations about the entire mess:
http://www.smartbitchestrashybooks.com/index.php/weblog/comments/want-to-self-publish-how-about-harlequin/
http://www.absolutewrite.com/forums/showthread.php?t=162391&page=1
For the vanity site:
http://www.dellartepress.com/
They also seem to have taken a cue from other vanity presses by using a name that could be confused with a standard publisher (Dell) which is still incredibly underhanded - but at least Harlequin gets to try and dust off its reputation.
Update/Edit:
Even the New Yorker got in on the scent of this rat:
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2009/11/harlequin-hacks.html
Thursday, November 26, 2009
Happy Thanksgiving All!
I went and saw Deadmou5 until 2am last night - he puts on an AMAZING show!
Pictures from the concert and trip coming soon!
Monday, November 16, 2009
My Salvation (Army, that is!)
So far, we've found matching candle holders, stripper shoes, and various other errata to add that all important perceived value to the production. (More on that later!)
Now, for really specific items you'll have to do more digging and have more time than we currently have; but I swear, you can find ANYTHING in these places...
I wish I was home, so I could actually get that creepy wire dress form! Somehow, I doubt that shipping would make it a worthwhile purchase.
In any case, our next installment of this blog will discuss how to add that perceived value to your short film.
On a completely different note, finished and sent off another chapter of the novella - it's chugging along like a coal powered freight train, but getting there!
Monday, November 9, 2009
Sunday, November 8, 2009
There and back again, part 1 - preparing...
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
Updates and adventures!
Thursday, October 29, 2009
OOOOhio, where the wind goes sweepin -wait, that's not it
Monday, October 26, 2009
I met Death...he plays the harmonica.
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
What's in a name? More than I thought...
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Always read the directions...
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
New gig and pics (finally) up!
Saturday, September 5, 2009
Threadless
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Another short...and some other things
Monday, August 24, 2009
Heat in the studio...
Saturday, August 22, 2009
Doctor, Doctor, gimme the news...
Thursday, August 20, 2009
The new blog is going...and a hmmm.
Monday, August 17, 2009
Word count, and new blog.
Friday, August 14, 2009
Word Counts, and house updates #2
Sunday, August 9, 2009
Word Counts, and house updates
Thursday, August 6, 2009
Lawnmower Man :(
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Short Film Fun
There's a whole set of em...
Monday, August 3, 2009
North Americans Don't Read?
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
The house that we built (sorta)
Saturday, July 25, 2009
Article about scam publisher
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Publishing takes FOREVER, don't panic.
Friday, July 17, 2009
Beating the slushpile? Not so much
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Wisdom can Stink
Sunday, July 5, 2009
Updates, and thoughts on non-fiction writing
Sunday, June 28, 2009
WHY people 'hate' Manga...
Thursday, June 25, 2009
Writing Comics!
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Writing a novel is like...
Saturday, June 20, 2009
We don't need no stinking rehearsals...
Friday, June 19, 2009
Where'd my other posts go? Gah.
Thursday, June 18, 2009
How I started my own writing group
Sunday, June 14, 2009
Whaddya mean you want a title?
Friday, June 12, 2009
I'm being interviewed for a book...
Tuesday, June 9, 2009
Literal Video 'Total Eclipse of the Heart'
Monday, June 8, 2009
Crushes on imaginary people - I have tons.
As the eyerolling commenced, she wanted to know what was the problem with having a crush on an imaginary character? Essentially, it's harmless fantasy, as long as you don't end up with unrealistic expectations of real people.
Absolutely. My issue was taking up an imaginary affair with a character that has no personality, no flair. He's described as 'perfect', and that's about it. How much duller can you get?
I got through a rather stormy break up by having a wild fling with Fox Mulder, and moving on to Jon-Luc Picard.
My current imaginary boyfriends are: Spider Callahan (Transmetropolitan:Comic), and Alan Shore (Boston Legal:TV series).
So I like bad boys. Witty, sarcastic bad boys who use their mental prowess to dance verbal circles around their opponents, as well as gain what little ground they can for the common man.
For the record, I've been personally compared to Gregory House. (Hadn't seen the show until a film cast started calling me 'House' - at which point, I had to see what they were talking about.) They were right, I do see the similarities. So much, in fact, that it would never work. Sorry Dr. House, we're just too much alike.
Saturday, June 6, 2009
The McBook
Friday, June 5, 2009
playing with photo montages
The Life and Times of the Nauga
Thursday, June 4, 2009
Goals for the next five days...
More Twilight Hilarity - from Cracked.com
Wednesday, June 3, 2009
The New Look - Yay or Nay?
Science Fiction Writer's of America - goldmine of information
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
One of the secrets to writing...
Thursday, May 28, 2009
How come THEY got published??
Sunday, May 24, 2009
The Queen of Swords
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Beatrix Potter? What are you smokin' - self publishing Myth #4
Mark Twain not so ahead, Self Publishing Myth #3
This has to be one of the stupider ones used for ‘proof’ – because Clemens lived in a time where it wasn’t all that odd for the writer to carry the expense, but he still almost went bankrupt.
There’s a lot more, as Twain was an extremely prolific writer, and I can’t get into all of it in the space of a blog, so we’ll move on to the first of his most well known works.
Hmmm. No self publishing here…
His very first book, The Gilded Age, was a collaboration between himself and Charles Dudley Warner. Also printed by American Publishing Company in 1873, it met many lukewarm reviews, mostly due to the two halves of the book not meshing well.
No self publishing there, either.
Twain loved technology, and part of the goal for starting his own publishing company was to revolutionize the printing press. He started his own publishing company with his nephew. Called the Charles L. Webster Publishing Company, who’s first printed book was…
The Huckleberry Finn debate: did Twain’s own company publish the book, or not? The story seems to go as such: After a falling out with the American Publishing Company, Twain attempted to publish Huck Finn through his own company, where it (like most of the other works he published) was a whispering flop.
Unlike most of the self publishing stories, Twain was trying to run his own publishing company, printing far more than his own work. He nearly went bankrupt as a result, and the company failed completely in 1894.
The complete list of books published through this company can be found here:
http://www.twainquotes.com/websterco.html
It seems pretty clear that Twain’s goal was to become a publisher, not specifically to self publish. Plus, he had literally hundreds of works under his belt before moving in this direction. Not too many casual observers even know that he had his own company.
Myth Busted.
Sunday, May 17, 2009
Crimes of exaggeration - Self Publishing Myth Debunked #2
Not so over the rainbow - Self Publishing Success Myth Busted #1
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
factNOtum - do your $&%^$ research!
Face it - for every work of genius that gets looked over, there are five million that DESERVE the slush pile. If I am not your friend, do not inundate my spaces with miserable 'poetry', 'rants', or any other scum deluging from your unpracticed fingers. I am so sick of 'aspiring writers' who have not taken the time to study the craft. That firmly believe every slimy bit of doggerel they put on paper is a work of misunderstood genius. Yes I am published. No, I never had to pay for it. Yes I get paid for it. If something doesn't 'click' for me, is it crap? Not indescriminately. But I've been getting so much that is total garbage to make my head spin. If it's honest to goodness crap, I will say so(usually in a more pleasant manner). Do not write me back to say that I just don't understand because I've never been there. It's your job to put me there. *pant pant* And you have no idea what my life has been like anyway. Please spellcheck your stories. I spellcheck blogs, you have no excuse. Learn some words. Read the damn dictionary if you must. Learn how to USE the words you know. Please know the basics of the area you're writing about. The empire state building is not in Albany. Nor is the Egg in NYC. These are major landmarks, and people DO care. There is not much skiing going on in Virginia in June. Do some research. If the killer is using a tommy gun, it's very unlikely a silencer would be used, nor are the chances of being unnoticed very good. Same goes with a colt 45. Yes these are fun distinctive weapons. No, an assasin would not have them. Nor would the average person be able to hide a claymore under his jacket. (Claymore is basically gaelic for 'big sword'.) These things tend to be a minimum of five feet long. It goes on. A stiletto is a slim dagger with two or three edges traditionally thought of as personal protection or assasination. It is not another word for switchblade. One implies elegance that a street thug probably does not posess. Upstate New York is neither the suburbs, nor Alaska. Small towns CAN be intellectual. Not all city people are vapid hustlers(there's a great contradiction right there). I'm sure there will be more. |
Agh, my eyes! How NOT to write a screenplay
I just got sent a short script that is a nightmare. Sparing y'all the pain of slogging through this mess, here are a few tips. WRITE IN THE PRESENT TENSE. Whatever is going on, even in flashback, happens right in front of your audience. If a character's 'eyes well with sympathy' chances are he's not going to throw the other guy to the ground yelling 'What the hell are you doing you basted!'. And it's bastard. Unless you are covering the stewing character in his own juices to make a tasty roast. Which could be interesting.... An upper crust exec would probably not wax poetic about how his lost love 'hypnotized him with obsession, created a love beyond ages'. This is the over poetic hype of an angsty, psudo artsy college student. If that's your guy, fine. Otherwise, the leave the antequated prose to Yeats and Poe. It lacks authenticity. Vietnam vets will rarely just sit down and say that thier experiences were anything like yours. Especially to a stranger. If you are lucky to find one of these back porch story tellers, the level of detail in the storytelling will be amazing. not 'I lost a lot of people in 'nam, it get's easier'. Sheesh. If you have no idea what went on, or have never spoken to a veteran, don't put that there. It makes you sound like an idiot. And the vagueness of the statement in this script will merely confuse the viewer. NARRATION. There have been great films that use it. Probably not yours. Especially when the narrator is talking about exactly what's happening in your frame. REDUNDANT. The whole medium is 'show'. If your audience can't tell what's going on by the action, or the narration doesn't take us farther into the character's head, lose it. Remember fight club? The narration brought us deeper into the character's mind, enhancing the relationship with the viewer. It was not there to tell us 'so and so was on his way home from work when....' If you can't show that, you have no business directing. I'm sure I will be subjected to many more miserable scripts before even the end of the year. If anyone has a specific question, feel free to shoot. |
’But my character is so COOL...’
...and your writing still sucks. One of the things that I've started noticing in aspiring fantasy writers is that, rather than working on the craft of writing, they're convinced that if the idea is cool enough, the story will be cool. Not so much. Please, please, no more vampires, werewolves, vampire/werewolf/elf/ninja/pirates(yep, I actually saw one of those). Tortured souls in the rain seems to be popular as well - except these 'dark silouhettes' always seem to be 'bourne upon the wind' on high 'spires' while 'lurking in drenched pain heart-rivers'(if you can find a more obtuse and poorly worded way of saying 'standing outside like a dumbass on the highest point in a thunderstorm', let me know). I have a thought for you: Stephen King. While the most successful horror writer of our time has touched upon all sorts of otherworldly beasties, his main characters tend to be very everyday folks. Yet somehow, these 12 year old kids, small town cops, struggling writers, etc, are some of the strongest characters in modern literature(yes, I consider King to be literature). Because? They're real. They are fully formed, well rounded people, with strengths, weaknesses, fears, joys, histories, and above all: WRITTEN WELL. Some of his bit players, I wouldn't be suprised to see pop up on a small town street to say 'Ayuh'. If all it took were 'cool' characters, every piece of eye bleeding, giggle inducing, or just plain painful fanfiction based on a masterpiece would be on the bestseller list. Yet every bit of it I've suffered through has been unreadable. Because these people never bothered learning how to write - so the characters they love so much have been rendered flat and dull, lacking even the vibrancy of a child's crayon drawing. Please, please, stop. I beg you. Stop slaughtering the characters you love, stop making a mockery of those supernatural creatures you adore so much. Unless its for spoof purposes. I think I'm going to write about a vampire elf pirate ninja werewolf just for silliness factor. Heh. |
No more, I beg you - plots/characters done to death
About a week, and a few hundred screenplay reviews later, I have ever increasing respect for the work it takes to finish one, as well as my own writing skills. Then again, as a contest, I wasn't necessarily skimming through the cream of the writing world. So this blog is about things that will have you tossed in a heartbeat(or have a reader who is paid to read and critique the whole script banging their head against a wall). Watch out for genre. If you're a stellar, original writer, you'll be able to take any premise and turn it on it's ear. This is actually harder than it sounds. There were a couple of scripts that were written pretty well, but everything in them was such old hat, that it felt like I was reading a couple of other movies mashed together, down to 'this scene was from x, and that one was from y'. And everyone's favorite plotlines: 1. The absolute most common one involved a writer with a problem, talking to a character in their mind or God. Whether this other character was a disembodied voice, object, therapist, whatever, this other character's sole purpose seemed to be either to taunt the protagonist with 'clever'(read, the writer found it clever, just like the other 6,000 writers) dime store existentialism, or to feed the protagonist lines in order for the main character to spout the same dogma. If your character or your 'voice' really has something interesting or unique to say, it could work - don't bank on it. The one thing that each of these scripts had in common(the actual storylines varied greatly) was that it looked like a mental masturbation session. Each writer plodded through the tired themes and eye rolling 'revelations', wallowing in their own perceived cleverness until I wanted to bash my head through the monitor. I'm sure every one of them genuinely thought they had something fresh and innovative to say - at least 40% of the scripts I read featured the same themes, addressed in exactly the same narssisistic fashion. Oh, and each of the writers(characters) in these screenplays were either struggling drunks, or wildly successful. Please, please, keep your personal fantasies or angst out of the characters, unless you're sure you really can hit new ground. 2. The Chosen One. I'm not sure whether to blame Bruce Almighty or The Matrix for this. The reluctant hero is chosen by some higher force to either deliver a message or save the world. So what did the two movies mentioned above have in common? They took this storyline and presented it in a new and innovative way. That does not mean that you can rip from either of these and be new, now its been done before. So your small town hero/messenger/Messiah damn well better be different, or have something new to say. And please, please, let the 'evil' character be something exciting. After wading through all of these evil, hot women trying to seduce the protagonist, I was dying to see an old fashioned demon. Or something with horns. Which leads us to - 3. Demonic Temptation. Old hat, but a sure one. Everyone loves that whole cosmic good vs. evil deal. There's nothing even wrong with your character wanting fame/fortune/sex - classic desires. But again, the presentation HAS to be fresh! What makes your protagonist different than the hundreds before, who have had the same desires, only to reach a point of enlightenment about 60 pages in, to realize they were better off before? 4. Da Mob I like a good Mafia movie, I really do. What I don't want to see is, however well written, a rehash of every Scorsese movie ever made, to the point that I can pick out each scene, and the movie it came from. Accents are tricky to write well. If you don't have the chops for it, readin' sometin' dat look like dis or worse is tough to get through, stilts the script itself, and does nothing for the sense of character. Say the person has a Brooklyn or Bronx accent, then let it go. 5. 'Action' scripts with no action! This is more of a writing thing than a story thing, but a heavy dialogue 'action' script where fight scenes equal 'they fight'??? C'mon, you weren't even trying with that one. On to the writing/character things that drove me nuts: 1. Stupid characters. I'm not talking about writing a character with Down's here, I'm talking about just plain stupid. Heads of state that don't know their pronouns. 'Brilliant' scientists that don't know the formal name for their own specialty. 'Genius' villains that are no smarter than the average teenager, with an attempt to make them look smarter by making every other character sound like a grade school dropout. This can be used as a technique for parody, such as in Idiocracy - where US culture looked down on being smart for so many generations, the brains were just bred out of people. Almost every character was a complete idiot, but for a reason. Otherwise, if you can't write 'smart' characters, don't. If you want a criminal mastermind, please don't make every other character stupid. Being average in a script full of idiots is like winning the grand prize at Poetry.com. It's just weak writing. Think of some great criminals - Hannibal Lecter, for instance. He didn't escape because the guards were stupid; he escaped because he was just that much smarter. Die Hard - how boring would that have been if the criminals had been dumb? It was gripping because John McClane was just a touch smarter, more resourceful, than the believable international criminals. I cannot emphasize enough how dull, bland, flat out LAME it is to see a script with an incredibly simple 'puzzle' or 'twist' and have the characters puzzling over it, when the average eight year old would be yelling 'It's x dumbass!!' Thrillers, action scripts, and horror movies seem to be most guilty of this. 2. The not so secret 'secret' symbol or clue How hard is it to come up with an original or obscure symbol for the characters to puzzle over? Helpful hints: neither the Eye of Horus nor an Ankh is mysterious enough for a group of teens to be flummoxed by, let alone a group of scientists. If you're not clear on the symbol, trust that a concept artist will be able to come up with something suitably cool. 3. Poorly explained away 'science' Often, in something with sci - fi overtones, there will be a technology that does something impossible. A lot of the time, if that machine is not the central object in the story, the audience won't really care how it works, such as Eternal Sunshine or The Prestige. Those bits of tech were never really explained, but within each respective world, they were buyable, accepted, and the story went on. Give enough hints as to how your tech works to make it believable, and move on. Or don't address it at all. Please, don't mangle current scientific concepts, or have a character say something to the effect 'you wouldn't understand' when another character asks. Either one is obnoxious. 4. Opening with a dream, or worse - the whole thing was just a dream The first is not always a deal breaker, the second, almost completely. I'm not sure what more to say about this. The reason being, that the viewer/reader becomes invested in the characters as they are presented, only to have to start over again after the dream 'ends'. How annoying is that? The exception comes when that opening scene is over the top in some way, either visuals(shimmering landscapes, morphing cars) or premise(a song and dance number on the moon, a 12 year old leading a guerilla militia) that's no more than two pages long. Long enough to understand why this dream is happening, short enough that the viewer isn't annoyed about being drawn into a storyline, only to have to start over. The whole thing was a dream just never works, here's why. The payoff will never be enough to have sat through over an hour of people, places, and events that didn't actually happen. Proviso: if the events are occurring within the mind of the character, and there are allusions to that throughout the work, then the reveal can be satisfying - because there's a puzzle of sorts involved. See Identity, for example. No spoilers here, but this is an example of a movie that uses the dual reality to great advantage. 5. Characters doing something 'out of character' for no reason, and characters without flaws, or only flaws These are vague enough to find your own example, but let's hit the second two for a moment. Have you ever met anyone without flaws? Or someone who implies that they have none? How dull would that person be? Likewise, a villain who's just evil. What motivates someone to do things just because it's wrong? How much more interesting a character who either has chosen greed over virtue, or one who, like Magneto, for example, genuinely believes that they are doing the right thing? So, those are my top five peeves in the plot/character category. Feel free to add your own, or discuss any of them further. |